Other than the comma splice (joining two complete thoughts together with a comma alone), it is fine. In these cases, only periods, semicolons, coordinating conjunctions, conjuncts, and em dashes are strong enough to join complete thoughts together. You could also weed out the second performance.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
enoon you should go past tense when you've just mentioned that it happened yesterday: "Yesterday's performance was amazing—it was the best performance I have ever seen.I would use 'was', but 'is' seems acceptable.
enoonAspara answered well, but in my humble opinion, you should go past tense when you've just mentioned that it happened yesterday: "Yesterday's performance was amazing—it was the best performance I have ever seen.But then don't you have to change the end as well? I think I would.
CalifJim enoonAspara answered well, but in my humble opinion, you should go past tense when you've just mentioned that it happened yesterday: "Yesterday's performance was amazing—it was the best performance I have ever seen.But then don't you have to change the end as well? I think I would.Yesterday's performance was amazing. It was the best performance I had ever seen.CJ
fivejedjonI am not sure that enoon's version is impossibleMe neither, but I thought I'd ask how others felt about it.
CalifJimI suppose the use of 'had' might suggest that I had/have seen an even better performance since then.I don't think that that is necessarily the case, though if you had seen a better performance since, 'had' would be obligatory.
fivejedjonif you had seen a better performance since, 'had' would be obligatory.Yes, that seems reasonable.
fivejedjoneven if my attempts at explanation haven't convinced you, that does not necessarily mean that the utterances are unacceptable.Oh, of course. That's a given. Understood.