0Hi,02br 02br 00Are they correct without any prior context to support their use?02br 02br 00Have you eaten Mexican foods? -- Why not 'food'?02br 02br 00Do you like Mexican foods? -- Why not 'food'?0-
Top answer
0-
— Mister Micawber
0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0Thank you.02br 02br 00Absent of any prior context, how come no1 would be allowed when no. 2 wouldn't?02br 02br 00You are not allowed to bring liquids into the seminar rooms.02br 02br 00You are not allowed to bring foods into the seminar rooms. 0-
0 .02br 00Because 01i00liquids02i00 is a countable noun (here plural), while 01i00food02i00 is uncountable except in topical discussions of nutrition and cuisine.0-
0Thank you, again.02br 02br 00How come both seem to be good.02br 02br 00You shouldn't bring liquid into the seminar room any time. -- good? Does that mean in any context, a person has an open option to use 'liquid' or 'liquids' depending on how he/she perceive a situation or the item? Why doesn't that option doesn't seem to be available for 'food' below?0
0 .02br 00It is an option unavailable to01i00 food02i00, that is all.02br 02br 01i00You shouldn't bring 01b00liquid(s)02b00 into the seminar room any time02br 00You shouldn't bring 01b00food02b00 into the seminar room any time02br 00You shouldn't bring 01b0
0Thank you, again.02br 02br 00Your sentence "It is an option unavailable to01i00 food02i00, that is all," why did you use a comma? I have seen this kind of uses in print and have wondered wjhat the part following the comma is called? I think some might argue the sentence is not grammatical but I don't think it is. Can you tell me the use, so I can use i