I have received conflicting instruction about whether/when commas are required between oppositional phrases of contrastive dependence.
When a subordinating clause is used at the beginning of a sentence, obviously the opposing phrases must be separated by a comma:
- Whereas the penny was plated with copper, the nickel was plated with silver. - While she looked ten years old, she was was actually fifteen.
But when a contrasting subordinating conjunction is placed between two clauses, does it always require a preceding comma?
- The nickel was plated with silver, whereas the penny was plated with copper. - She was actually fifteen years old, while she looked only ten. - Traditional robots run on acid batteries, whereas newly developed robots run on solar cells. - I prefer white wine, whereas my boyfriend prefers beer. - I am single, while my best friend is married.
I wonder whether the rule changes depending on the isolated independence of the contrasting clause? i.e. If the contrastive dependence clause is not complete (lacks subject/verb) then no comma is required before the subordinating conjunction?
- I ate all of the cheese, except I didn't touch the brie. - I ate all of the cheese [ x ] except for the brie.
- Traditional robots run on acid batteries, whereas new models run on solar cells.
- Traditional robots run on acid batteries [ x ]whereas new models don't.
- I prefer white wine, while my boyfriend prefers beer. - I prefer white wine [ x ] while my boyfriend prefers red.
Can somebody please clarify the use of punctuation with the subordinating conjunction whereas?
Thank you in advance.
Top answer
I think it has more to do with length and complexity of the clauses. )
— Mister Micawber
I think it has more to do with length and complexity of the clauses.
)
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.