0
PreciousJones Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Contract

I cancelled the contract thinking that I won't be liable for the months after. Or

I cancelled the contract thinking that I wouldn't be liable for the months after.

Are both useable and what's the difference when using won't and wouldn't

Thank you!
  

Top answer

PreciousJones what's the difference Matching the tenses ( cancelled ... wouldn't ... ) is the usual and more consistent way of saying it.

— CalifJim

  • PreciousJones what's the difference Matching the tenses ( cancelled ...
  • wouldn't ...
  • ) is the usual and more consistent way of saying it.
  • The other version seems to switch horses in midstream, so when we hear "won't" after "cancelled", we feel the jarring effect of a sudden change in the point of view, as if you're switching from telling the story to making a direct quote of your thoughts at the time, thus: I cancelled, thinking, "I won't be liable".
  • If you are really thinking of it this way, and saying it this way with your voice (with a little pause after "thinking"), then you can use this one, but I think there are fewer headaches if you just use "wouldn't".
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
PreciousJoneswhat's the difference
Matching the tenses (cancelled ... wouldn't ...) is the usual and more consistent way of saying it.

The other version seems to switch horses in midstream, so when we hear "won't" after "cancelled", we feel the jarring effect of a sudden change in the point of view, as if you're switching from telling the story
0
0
Its wouldn't. will is the first conditional would is the second conditional. When dealing with a condition in the past you use the second conditional. If like CalifJim says you're actually quoting what you thought in the moment then you would put quotes around "I won't be liable.. after"
0

Related Questions