Connected speech isn't always used?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tu7HbyMDvhLeNpeFOqpyQ3XnR4qOy8jK/view
he connects the sound between the word "letters" and "are" = "lettersare" but not between the word "that" and "at", "pound" and "of"? why?
Top answer
Without going to the site you offered, I'll give you a simple answer. Some sounds are more conducive to attaching to the next word. "S" is a good example.
- Without going to the site you offered, I'll give you a simple answer.
- Some sounds are more conducive to attaching to the next word.
- "S" is a good example.
- "T" is different.
- If you say "that total," the t sounds will blend.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Without going to the site you offered, I'll give you a simple answer. Some sounds are more conducive to attaching to the next word. "S" is a good example. "T" is different. If you say "that total," the t sounds will blend. But if you say "that at," they won't. Why? Because it would sound like /thæ tæt/.
As I said, that was my simple answer. What is the pronunciation difference between
0Think about the placement and configuration of mouth, lips and tongue for each sound. How much do you have to change the configuration between the ending sound of one word and the beginning sound of the next?
http://www.speechlanguage-resources.com/speech-sound-structures.
0mosjahttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1tu7HbyMDvhLeNpeFOqpyQ3XnR4qOy8jK/view
he connects the sound between the word "letters" and "are" = "lettersare" but not between the word "that" and "at", "pound" and "of"? why?
"that" and "at"
0
Related Questions