0
Silak12 Posted 9 years ago
Grammar

Confusions about "it"

Hi! everyone.

Could you help allay my confusions over these?

The book is nice to look at.

The book is nice to be looked at.

The book is nice to look at it.

Which of the above sentences are correct?

I see a book and say;

A: It is nice to look at.

Does "it" in A refer to book?

B: It is nice to look at it.

Can B be rephrased into;

looking at it is nice.

Does "it" in B not have any literal meaning?

Thanks!

  

Top answer

" is correct. " is theoretically grammatical, but awkward-sounding. " is ungrammatical.

  • " is correct.
  • " is theoretically grammatical, but awkward-sounding.
  • " is ungrammatical.
  • " is correct.
  • " is correct, but not in the sense above.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0

"The book is nice to look at." is correct.

"The book is nice to be looked at." is theoretically grammatical, but awkward-sounding.

"The book is nice to look at it." is ungrammatical.

"It is nice to look at." is correct. "It" means "the book."

"It is nice to look at it." is correct, but not in the sense above. This sentence means that the act of looking at the is b

0
silak12The book is nice to look at. The book is nice to be looked at. The book is nice to look at it. Which of the above sentences are correct?

Only the first is idiomatic.

silak12A: It is nice to look at. Does "it" in A refer to book?

Yes.

silak12B: It is nice to look at it. Can B be re

Related Questions