0
Nightingale09 Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Confusion of conditional clause pattern 4

about conditional clause which is

would

if + s + had +v3, s + should + have + v3

might

such as "If i had received the message, I would have gone to see him"
"If it had been dark, we could have visited you"


both of them are correct but I found one sentence in my textbook which is

"If they had taken your advice, they would have had saved a lot of time"

I was wondering that "have had" was wrong when you look at the structure .Could anyone gives me an explaination ? Thank you.

PS.I'm Thai student .Sorry for any mistaken grammar
  

Top answer

It is probably a misprint, an unintentional error. ' You also know that 'have' and its forms can be verbal auxiliaries which, combined with the past participle form of a verb, are used to express the 'perfect' tenses of a verb, as illustrated in your example. " Notice that an application as a verb and an application as an auxiliary have both been demonstrated.

  • It is probably a misprint, an unintentional error.
  • ' You also know that 'have' and its forms can be verbal auxiliaries which, combined with the past participle form of a verb, are used to express the 'perfect' tenses of a verb, as illustrated in your example.
  • " Notice that an application as a verb and an application as an auxiliary have both been demonstrated.
  • "
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
It is probably a misprint, an unintentional error.

The sentence should read:
"If they had taken your advice, they would have saved a lot of time."

You probably know the verb 'to have' means 'to hold or maintain as a
possession.' Had is the past tense of have, meaning, 'formerly possessed.'
You also know that 'have' and its forms can be verbal auxiliaries which,

Related Questions