Confusion!
In the case of assault, threatening to cause harm to a person but not carrying through on the threat would be classified as a misdemeanor.
Is this a second conditional would?
Top answer
anonymous In the case of assault, threatening to cause harm to a person but not carrying through on the threat would be classified as a misdemeanor. Is this a second conditional would? No, because there is no "if".
- anonymous In the case of assault, threatening to cause harm to a person but not carrying through on the threat would be classified as a misdemeanor.
- Is this a second conditional would?
- No, because there is no "if".
- ), so it's an implicit second conditional.
- CJ
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
anonymousIn the case of assault, threatening to cause harm to a person but not carrying through on the threat would be classified as a misdemeanor.
Is this a second conditional would?
No, because there is no "if". However, the gerund subject serves as an if-clause (if you threatened to cause harm ...), so it's an implicit se
0
Related Questions