"If appropriate works of fine art could be rendered permanently accessible to the public by means of high-fidelity reproductions, as literature and music already are, the public may feel somewhat less in awe of them. Unfortunately, that may be too much to ask from those who seek to maintain and control the art establishment ."
Based on the article above, Can anyone figure out these statements below?
1. Reproductions of fine art should only be sold to the public if they are of high quality (TRUE, FALSE, NOT GIVEN)
2. In the future, those with power are likely to encourage more people to enjoy art.(TRUE, FALSE, NOT GIVEN)
Thankfully,
Nguyen
First, what are your answers, please? Do you feel that you understand the text?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
First, what are your answers, please?
Do you feel that you understand the text?
My question are:
1. TRUE ( because I think they have the reason which help people feel less awe of fine art so the reproductions fine art in high quality should be sold to people). I think FALSE or maybe NOT GIVEN, because the writer makes it all sound very hypothetical.
2. FALSE I agree.