0
Proto Posted 17 years ago
Grammar
Confusing grammatical structure
Hi,
I am confused about this sentence:
"Either way, we are neither of us our own masters"
Could someone tell me how this structure is called? I mean "we are neither of us". I have never seen such thing before and I can't find it anywhere. Does this structure has a name? Or mabey it is just relative clause but someone forgott to add comas...
Thanks in advance
I am confused about this sentence:
"Either way, we are neither of us our own masters"
Could someone tell me how this structure is called? I mean "we are neither of us". I have never seen such thing before and I can't find it anywhere. Does this structure has a name? Or mabey it is just relative clause but someone forgott to add comas...
Thanks in advance
Top answer
That pattern is rarely used, but it is essentially the same structure as shown below. I don't know if it has a name, but it's a sort of displaced appositive construction, the second form being a normal appositive construction. We are all our own masters.
- That pattern is rarely used, but it is essentially the same structure as shown below.
- I don't know if it has a name, but it's a sort of displaced appositive construction, the second form being a normal appositive construction.
- We are all our own masters.
- = We all are our own masters.
- = All of us are our own masters.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
6 Answers
0
That pattern is rarely used, but it is essentially the same structure as shown below. I don't know if it has a name, but it's a sort of displaced appositive construction, the second form being a normal appositive construction.
We are all our own masters. = We all are our own masters. = All of us are our own masters.
Hence, substituing "neither of us" for "all":
We are all our own masters. = We all are our own masters. = All of us are our own masters.
Hence, substituing "neither of us" for "all":
00
Well that explains ewerything I have another question. Can 'neither' be replaced with 'none' if there are more people involved?
I have another question. Can 'neither' be replaced with 'none' if there are more people involved?00
0
I was reading it once again and again I got confused.
"We are all our own masters. = We all are our own masters. = All of us are our own masters.
Hence, substituing "neither of us" for "all" "
Just to make it clear: the sentence 'We are neither of us our own masters' means that both of them aren't their own masters or they are? Because you substituted 'neither' f
"We are all our own masters. = We all are our own masters. = All of us are our own masters.
Hence, substituing "neither of us" for "all" "
Just to make it clear: the sentence 'We are neither of us our own masters' means that both of them aren't their own masters or they are? Because you substituted 'neither' f
00
Protoyou substituted 'neither' for 'all' and I don't know why youI thought you were already familiar with those structures with "all", and that you already knew that those were grammatical.dodid thatfor.
Protothe sentence 'We are
00
Related Questions