0
99munsea94 Posted 9 years ago
Grammar

Confusing Comma Usage

Dear forum,

Can somebody inform me as to what the difference is between the following two sentences:

1. "A dependent clause functions within another clause, as a subject, completer, or modifier."

and

2. "A dependent clause functions within another clause as a subject, completer, or modifier."

The comma between 'clause' and 'as' has been omitted from the second sentence (by me), so my question is this: what is the comma's function in 1., and how does it omission in 2. change the interpretation of the sentence? Is it the "additional, non-essential material" rule for commas?

The original extract is from http://www.grammar-once-and-for-all.com/syntax/introducing-complex-sentences/ towards the end of the page, in case it's relevant.

Thank you for any responses I may receive in advance.

  

Top answer

Hi The comma's quite often used to indicate where the speaker has made a pause, to make their sentence more understandable. If I had to say that the way that a clause acts is as a subject completer or modifier, I'd probably pause three times, briefly, where the commas are in your given sentence Dave

  • Hi The comma's quite often used to indicate where the speaker has made a pause, to make their sentence more understandable.
  • If I had to say that the way that a clause acts is as a subject completer or modifier, I'd probably pause three times, briefly, where the commas are in your given sentence Dave
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0

Hi

The comma's quite often used to indicate where the speaker has made a pause, to make their sentence more understandable. If I had to say that the way that a clause acts is as a subject completer or modifier, I'd probably pause three times, briefly, where the commas are in your given sentence

Dave

0

Hi

Yes, if there's a heroic-looking guy with a barrel chest and a beard, he's probably the culprit!

And, of course, I've remade your sentence there

You raise a good point and I understand it. Why aren't there straightforward rules for punctuation? I think I'd say that there's always a tension between speech and written language. It's good to know the formal rules for writing

0

I think either would be perfectly natural, because when speaking the sentence makes sense and sounds natural either when pausing or not pausing after the word "clause".

Related Questions