Dear forum,
Can somebody inform me as to what the difference is between the following two sentences:
1. "A dependent clause functions within another clause, as a subject, completer, or modifier."
and
2. "A dependent clause functions within another clause as a subject, completer, or modifier."
The comma between 'clause' and 'as' has been omitted from the second sentence (by me), so my question is this: what is the comma's function in 1., and how does it omission in 2. change the interpretation of the sentence? Is it the "additional, non-essential material" rule for commas?
The original extract is from http://www.grammar-once-and-for-all.com/syntax/introducing-complex-sentences/ towards the end of the page, in case it's relevant.
Thank you for any responses I may receive in advance.
Hi The comma's quite often used to indicate where the speaker has made a pause, to make their sentence more understandable. If I had to say that the way that a clause acts is as a subject completer or modifier, I'd probably pause three times, briefly, where the commas are in your given sentence Dave
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hi
The comma's quite often used to indicate where the speaker has made a pause, to make their sentence more understandable. If I had to say that the way that a clause acts is as a subject completer or modifier, I'd probably pause three times, briefly, where the commas are in your given sentence
Dave
Hi
Yes, if there's a heroic-looking guy with a barrel chest and a beard, he's probably the culprit!
And, of course, I've remade your sentence there
You raise a good point and I understand it. Why aren't there straightforward rules for punctuation? I think I'd say that there's always a tension between speech and written language. It's good to know the formal rules for writing
I think either would be perfectly natural, because when speaking the sentence makes sense and sounds natural either when pausing or not pausing after the word "clause".