0
Anonymous Posted 9 years ago
Grammar

confused about past perfect.

Talking about Past Perfect, could you explain me why the author from the Economist magazine uses this tense in the following sentence " Arsen Pavlov, better known as Motorola, was a Russian irregular who boasted of killing Ukrainian prisoners-of-war and HAD started to act independently of Moscow." Logically, he always was a russian irregular, so he couldnt boast earlier about killings than he was an irregular. Maybe Past Perfect is used to emphasise the action that would have far-reaching conseqeunces ( Arsen Pavlolv is said to have been killled by Russian spooks for non toeing the Russian line). http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21709066-while-foreign-powers-argue-about-its-future-ukrainians-struggle-take-their-destiny
  

Top answer

Anonymous to emphasise the action that would have far-reaching conseqeunces Yes. When he started acting independently, it was his death sentence. It was OK to be an irregular.

  • Anonymous to emphasise the action that would have far-reaching conseqeunces Yes.
  • When he started acting independently, it was his death sentence.
  • It was OK to be an irregular.
  • It was OK to boast of killing prisoners, but it was not OK to defy Putin.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Anonymousto emphasise the action that would have far-reaching conseqeunces
Yes. When he started acting independently, it was his death sentence. It was OK to be an irregular. It was OK to boast of killing prisoners, but it was not OK to defy Putin.
0
."In an end-run around Venediktov, the station’s main shareholder, Gazprom-Media, had fired the reporter and locked down Echo’s offices". Could we say... fired the reporter and locked the offices? So is this an emphasis too? or is it the same meaning as HAD fired the reporter and Had locked the offices, thanks
0
Anonymouscould you explain me why the author from the Economist magazine uses this tense in the following sentence [Omit 'me'.]
The temporal point of view, i.e., "the time frame", is established by the parts in blue. The parts in red took place before that established time frame.
.
In the first example be

Related Questions