Hi guys,
I came across the following conditional statement when reading a newspaper.
President Vladimir Putin, himself a former KGB spy, said earlier this month that Skripal would have been dead if he was attacked with a weapons grade agent.
I learned, for if statements, we use the combination of had + would have, for instance, if I had gone to the university, I would have gotten a high paid job. Therefore, shouldn't the word "had" was written in the article instead of the word "was"?
President Vladimir Putin, himself a former KGB spy, said earlier this month that Skripal would have been dead if he
washad attacked with a weapons grade agent.
Thanks
Faraz Amjad
"if he had attacked" would mean that he was the attacker. It should be "if he had been attacked".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
"if he had attacked" would mean that he was the attacker. It should be "if he had been attacked".