Conditional sentence difference
Hi teachers
I would like to know the difference in meaning between these two sentences:
If it weren’t for you, I would not be a doctor.
If it had not been for you, I would not have been a doctor.
If it weren’t for you, I would not be here.
If it had not been for you, I would not have been here.
I think both are correct but I am confused about what they mean, which is real and which is not. Pleass clarify!
Thanks!
Top answer
anonymous which is real and which is not. They are all unreal. anonymous If it weren’t for you, I would not be a doctor.
- anonymous which is real and which is not.
- They are all unreal.
- anonymous If it weren’t for you, I would not be a doctor.
- If it had not been for you, I would not have been a doctor.
- In the first of the pair, the speaker is talking about the fact that he is a doctor now.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
anonymouswhich is real and which is not.
They are all unreal.
anonymousIf it weren’t for you, I would not be a doctor.
If it had not been for you, I would not have been a doctor.
In the first of the pair, the speaker is talking about the fact that he is a doctor now.
In the second, the speaker is talking ab
0
Related Questions