0
Anonymous Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

Conditional

Hi.

"But any move that further eroded the returns of savers, even indirectly, would face a backlash. [From The Independent.]

Is the construction "...that further eroded the returns of savers, even indirectly, would face a backlash" a conditinal one?

Thank you.
  

Top answer

No

  • No
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
Thank you, Fivejedon, for your reply.

But why not? If the construction I cited isn't the conditional one, then the whole sentence is a conditinal one, isnt it?
0
AnonymousIf the construction I cited isn't the conditional one, then the whole sentence is a conditinal one, isnt it?
No. This is constructed as a conditional: "If there were any move that further eroded the returns of savers, even indirectly, it would face a backlash."

0
Thank you, Fivejedjon, for your useful reply.

But still, if from the strictly "technical" point of view it is not the conditional construction, then, in my opinion, the meaning is. What I mean is the hypothetical past tense of the verb "erode" which refers to the present and future time.
0
AnonymousBut still, if from the strictly "technical" point of view it is not the conditional construction, then, in my opinion, the meaning is. What I mean is the hypothetical past tense of the verb "erode" which refers to the present and future time.
I see your point. However, we need to recognise that not all uses of the past tense for present/future hypothe

Related Questions