0
Anonymous Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Conditional

Hello,

I have some doubts regarding certain complex strutures:

#1 Suppose I want to write in past conditional the following sentence: If X had gone fishing, Y would have gone fishing too. I am sure this is right, but what if I want to use 'so would' since both X and Y perform the same actions? Had X gone fishing, so would have Y. Is this 'so would have' right because it is past conditional?

#2 The method was to change X to Y in the hopes that the result 'would have' some meaning.
The method was to change X to Y in the hopes that the result 'would have had' some meaning.
Since it is past tense, I am not sure which is right - would have or would have had?

#3 Moses said to God: You are He who has no name. Or is it: You are him who has no name. Do I treat this as objective or subjective case?

#4 He could have attacked them without being attacked by them.
Is 'being attacked' correct here, or must it be 'getting attacked'?

Thank you.
  

Top answer

I also think so. biz ]Watch The Twilight Saga Eclipse Online Free[/url]

  • I also think so.
  • biz ]Watch The Twilight Saga Eclipse Online Free[/url]
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
I also think so.

________________
[url=http://moviesonlinefree.biz]Watch The Twilight Saga Eclipse Online Free[/url]

Related Questions