If we want to dig deep into the conditionals and subjunctives, they can get confusing and messy. But focusing on the 3 types of conditional alone, both sentences do not have the right mixes in their elements to be qualified as conditionals as they lack the basic conditional requirements. For # 1 to be grammatically qualified as a conditional, the context must comply to one of the 3 types of conditional Forms.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
IvanhrHow do I call this usage of conditional?You mean "first", "second", and "third"? Neither of your sentences follow any of those three patterns. Is that what you wanted to know?
CalifJimIvanhrHow do I call this usage of conditional?You mean "first", "second", and "third"? Neither of your sentences follow any of those three patterns. Is that what you wanted to know?
CJ
I understand that there are many conditional sentences that don't fit the pattern of either of the three basic types
Ivanhr
So, how do you feel about the sentences I posted and would you ever use them?
IvanhrWhy aren't they dealt with in grammar books?While CJ is probably sleeping like a baby, I would take a shot at replying your question.
IvanhrIf he took my advice he did the right thing"
dimsumexpress
How does this sound to you?
If you took the direction I gave you, you got home.
It sounds weird; doesn't it?
To me , it sounds weird only because of the 'you'. (you're talking to him now so there's no need for guessing)
If it were he/she/Mark etc it would be fine, I think.
If he took the directions I