compromise between or tradeoff

I can only say that 'tradeoff' seems more informal.

Thank you.

Well, I guess you meant your reply in here:

from this address:


gomblan:
Compromises are seen as characteristics that one is willing to overlook in order for both parties to maintain an equal stance. For instance, a district attorney gets a case that involves a defend

Thanks, I read it many times to understand. That was a very good explanation, and thank you for your time, but I didn't understand the logic of :

gomblanOne attorney offered dropping one count, drunk in public, in order to stabilize his client's position, the defendant.

Why the other side would accept that? I don't see any bargain.

Then again, I guess y

USFin compromise, you argue until reaching a point that both reach an agreement, some sort of outer force that made you pull back from your ideal conditions, but in a tradeoff, you see two good things, but according to limitation or some conditions, you choose let go one of your ideal and stick to other one.

I have no legal training, so I don't about the attor

Neither do I. And thanks! You restored my faith in my English.