I’m still so caught in the transition between old and new that I have trouble sometimes with these things. That’s why I was confused about it being a subordinate clause, since I had considered it a phrase. What is the designations for both now? Traditionally, a clause had to contain a subject.
allexkramer432 I’m still so caught in the transition between old and new that I have trouble sometimes with these things. Me too! Don't feel like the Lone Ranger.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
allexkramer432I’m still so caught in the transition between old and new that I have trouble sometimes with these things.
Me too! Don't feel like the Lone Ranger.
allexkramer432Traditionally, a clause had to contain a subject.
Except for imperatives, of course, where the subject is implicit.
Implicit subjects