You would have to make it clear by the pattern of your speech. In theory, saying "is" or "are" should be enough to identify which you mean, but in practice, nobody would actually notice whether it was "is" or "are" that you said. So you'd have to say either Kemal [pause} and Ayse or Mehmet {pause} are coming with us.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
fivejedjonKemal is coming with us, as is either Ayse or Mehmet.Hello fivejedjon, if I may just ask, would inversion make any difference here:
SurferKemal is coming with us, as either Ayse or Mehmet is.This sounds unnatural and wrong to me.
alabacaknetKemal and Ayse or Mehmet is/are coming with us.Kemal and Ayse - is a compound subject, thus, "are" is the apprporiate verb.
alabacaknetKemal and Ayse or Mehmet is/are coming with us. Who's coming with us?If ordinary language were as strict as formal logic, this would be a no-brainer. In the hierarchy of operator precedence, "and" comes before "or": [Kemal and Ayse] or [Mehmet].
CalifJimOn a menu, for example, you might see Eggs and ham or sausages. Since ham and sausages are both meats, the intended grouping is almost certainly [Eggs] and [ham or sausages], i.e., [eggs and ham] or [eggs and sausages].Or even [eggs and ham] or [sausages].
fivejedjonOr even [eggs and ham] or [sausages].Is that a British interpretation?
CalifJim fivejedjonOr even [eggs and ham] or [sausages].Is that a British interpretation?CJI don't think it's particularly British. Actually, I don't think it's a very likely interpretation with those particular items of food, but it could be with others, for example, [sausage and mash] or [toad-in-the-hole], [fish and chips] or [pizza ], [liver and bacon]