Commas separating independent clauses with implied subjects
Thanks in advance for your help. Maybe it's the lack of sleep, but I'm over thinking commas in compound sentences where the second clause has an implied subject.
Which is correct?
a) The doctor finished the shot, and removed the restraining wires. or b) The doctor finished the shot and removed the restraining wires.
c) The shapes refused to come together, and became lost in a numbing darkness or d) The shapes refused to come together and became lost in a numbing darkness
And what if we change the coordinating conjunction?
e) She could taste blood in her mouth, but could not feel the right side of her face. or f) She could taste blood in her mouth but could not feel the right side of her face.
Top answer
Of a&b, b is correct. The two actions take place within moments of each other and have the same subject. Gramatically, d and f are correct as well.
— BarbaraPA
Of a&b, b is correct.
The two actions take place within moments of each other and have the same subject.
Gramatically, d and f are correct as well.
But if you were reading c&d out loud, you'd pause, I think, and so therefore a comma is acceptable.
Likewise with e&f - if you are giving strictly a factual recitation of her condition, then do not use the comma.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Unfortunately, I posted this topic without realizing that I was not logged in. Since anonymous posts have to be moderator approved, I have two threads going on this question. See also:
The passage in question is part of a disjointed narrative from a character passing in and out of consciousness. AP style would remove the commas that separate the bold phrases,