I would use a comma before because only in rare cases to avoid confusion. I'll use a recent post as an example: It's hard to say that we've been put on this earth for a sole reason because… See the problem? , Because Mallow is crying, it is raining.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Anonymous1-He quarreled, because they provoked himNo. No comma. The main clause is so short that there is no need at all to resort to a comma to clarify the sentence structure. In general, don't use a comma before a because clause.
enoon"He went to sleep, because there was nothing else he could do until morning."No comma is needed here. Besides, the second clause in fact does account for his retirement: There was nothing else he could do until morning. What other purpose could because possibly serve?
Aspara GusNo comma is needed here. Besides, the second clause in fact does account for his retirement: There was nothing else he could do until morning. What other purpose could because possibly serve?Without the comma, the sentence becomes an explanation of why he went to sleep. What if I'm not trying to give a reason for his retirement but just saying he di
CliveHi,I agree with enoon.If the stress and focus is very much on the main clause, it seems quite natural to me to pause before continuing.CliveI agree as well, as long as because doesn't separate the two clauses. The word's sole purpose is to express a straightforward cause and effect. Clearly that was not enoons intention.