No, not at all. Restrictive subordinators would not normally be preceded by commas.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousDo you think we should almost always (possibly always?) place a comma before a subordinate clause when an independent clause precedes it?I agree with Mr. Micawber. In fact, I think you'll find the comma is more often omitted between a main clause and a following subordinate clause. This is especially true with the conjunctions if and beca
AnonymousSo would you say thatThat seems reasonable, yes. However, I am not familiar with the term "restrictive" being used for any but relative (adjectival) subordinate clauses. That leaveseventhougheven though all are subordinate clauses, if one is restrictive, it will not normally preceded by commas?