0
Vsuresh Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Comma?

Hi

Can you help?

This is a phrase meant for an advertisement. It was given in a question paper in an incorrect form. The student was required to arrange the words in the correct order.

Wanted a handicapped nurse for a baby about forty years old. (?)

Answer - Wanted a nurse, about forty years old, for a handicapped baby.

My question: Are the commas necessary here? if they are not. can we consider giving the allotted mark if the commas have been added?
  

Top answer

I believe there is no "rule" governing their use here, but it seems to me that it reads better with them.

  • I believe there is no "rule" governing their use here, but it seems to me that it reads better with them.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
I believe there is no "rule" governing their use here, but it seems to me that it reads better with them.
0
This type of writing is different and it is more forgiving. Commas separate the requirements. Yes, they are needed.

In the US, it is illegal to specify age in a want Ad. But giving the context, I would offer this example:

Nurse wanted: must be mature, 40's, female preferred, to care for a physically challenged child, experience working with young children is a must.
0
The ads I see usually leave out the first article, thus:

Wanted: Nurse, about 40 years old, for a handicapped baby. (Commas optional.)

OR

Wanted: Nurse for a handicapped baby, about 40 years old.

In the second case, you absolutely have to have the comma. I don't think I need to explain why!

CJ
0
CalifJimWanted: Nurse for a handicapped baby about 40 years old.
This is hilarious!Emotion: rofl
0

Related Questions