0
Usenet Posted 18 years ago
Usage

Combinations of 'sub'

Hello,
I am wondering if there is a general rule about how to combine 'sub' with other words. There seem to be a few fixed words like 'subdivide' or 'subset'. But what about other word creations like 'subcomponent' or 'subtask'? Should I separate them with a hyphen or with a space or should I write them together like I did?
Thanks for help.
Martin
  

Top answer

[nq:1]Hello, I am wondering if there is a general rule about how to combine 'sub' with other words. There seem ... with a hyphen or with a space or should I write them together like I did?

  • [nq:1]Hello, I am wondering if there is a general rule about how to combine 'sub' with other words.
  • There seem ...
  • with a hyphen or with a space or should I write them together like I did?
  • Thanks for help.
  • Martin[/nq] If you wrote sub component, that would be a component for a submarine.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

11 Answers
0
[nq:1]Hello, I am wondering if there is a general rule about how to combine 'sub' with other words. There seem ... with a hyphen or with a space or should I write them together like I did? Thanks for help. Martin[/nq]
If you wrote sub component, that would be a component for a submarine.

So don't use a space.
Maybe a hyphen would help sometimes, but generally, I think you can even
0
(attributions, sigs, and such tidied up)
[nq:2]I am wondering if there is a general rule about ... space or should I write them together like I did?[/nq]
[nq:1]If you wrote sub component, that would be a component for a submarine.[/nq]
Ha, ha.
[nq:1]So don't use a space. Maybe a hyphen would help sometimes, but generally, I > think you can even coin your own words by just cannec
0
[nq:1]If you wrote sub component, that would be a component for a submarine.[/nq]
Or the complement to the dom component in a kinky relationship.
[nq:1]So don't use a space. Maybe a hyphen would help sometimes, but generally, I think you can even coin your own words by just cannect sub to the front of another.[/nq]
"Sub-" is indeed productive (as Bob said), numbering among the affixes
0
[nq:1]Hello, I am wondering if there is a general rule about how to combine 'sub' with other words. There seem ... with a hyphen or with a space or should I write them together like I did? Thanks for help. Martin[/nq]
Martin,
There is no hard-and-fast rule about this, but books have been written about it. Common practice differs slightly across countries and even regions.
Generally, na
0
There was nothing less suitable about what I said. If you want to add something, why can't you just add it, without the need to try to elevate your remarks over someone else's.
Odysseus said pretty much what you did in his post, but managed to so nicely.
[nq:1]"Sub" is what's called a "productive" affix. It can be prefixed to all sorts of nouns and adjectives to create new nouns. No hyphen
0
[nq:1]Hello, I am wondering if there is a general rule about how to combine 'sub' with other words. There seem ... Should I separate them with a hyphen or with a space or should I write them together like I did?[/nq]
Nowadays, most expressions are written together, no space, no hyphen, when it comes to sub-prefix.
As long as you are consistent and the context is obvious, don't worry about
0
[nq:2]In more suitable terms:[/nq]
[nq:1]There was nothing less suitable about what I said.[/nq]
It wasn't what you said. It was the way you said it. I used standard grammatical terms. To me, at least, standard grammatical terms are more suitable to the discussion of grammar and usage than the sort of language you used. There is the risk of lapsing into jargon, but I don't think that happe
0
[nq:2]There was nothing less suitable about what I said.[/nq]
[nq:1]It wasn't what you said. It was the way you said it.[/nq]
My complaint is just as applicable. "What I said" included the way I said it. There was nothing less suitable about what I said or the way I said it.
Why did you snip the text which is the topic of this discussion?
[nq:1]I used standard grammatical terms. To
0
[nq:2]I had written: With me, it's more like a wheeze. I don't inhale, though.[/nq]
[nq:1]Jerk.[/nq]
I apologize for this last line. I was influenced by the whole thread and the many prior threads, and your frivolous reply just above to my previous post. But since the particular you were replying to, at the top here, was somewhat insulting, I could have, probably should have, ignored the f
0
[nq:1]Why did you snip the text which is the topic of this discussion?[/nq]
Because it's highly unlikely that anyone other than the two of us will even read this discussion, and if anyone does accomplish the unlikely he or she can easily trace prior posts via references or Google. I've similarly snipped a bunch of stuff from the post I'm replying to now.
[nq:2]I used standard grammatical t

Related Questions