0
Antonia Posted 21 years ago
Vocabulary

collection

Hello!

Can you please answer two questions:

1) Is it OK to say a Harvard collection of in

While establishing strategic approach to negotiation in a company, it is useful to be guided by instructions of Jeff Weisse /37, page 96-99/ gathered in a Harvard collection of scientific and expert works on principled negotiation.

2) Is it Ok to say scientific and expert works, expert as opposed to purely scientific, as works that are products of practice, not theory?

Thank you in advance
  

Top answer

1-- Yes, no problem. 2-- Hmm. I think you are being redundant; expert seems wrong here.

  • 1-- Yes, no problem.
  • 2-- Hmm.
  • I think you are being redundant; expert seems wrong here.
  • Science includes both theory and practice.
  • Are you looking for another pair, like theoretical and practical works or purely scientific and technological works or ?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
1-- Yes, no problem.

2-- Hmm. I think you are being redundant; expert seems wrong here. Science includes both theory and practice. Are you looking for another pair, like theoretical and practical works or purely scientific and technological works or ?

Perhaps there are other pairs...
0
Thank you for your post.

2) scientific and technological would do I guess, but is there any technology in negotiation?
0
Is there any science in negotiation? You're the one reading the book, Antonia.
0
Sorry:)

I don't know, and it is not a book, just a couple of papers. I'll stick with theory and practice then. It's an issue within the field of economy and I think there's an attempt to make scientific works on the topic, the experts conduct various research and experiments in order to prove main principles of negotiation. But on the other hand, it's not medicine or linguistics.

Related Questions