0 Hi all 02br 02br 001. Nimbostratus clouds are thick, dark gray clouds .... forebode rain 02br 00a. what 02br 00b. which 02br 00c. what they 02br 00d. which they 02br 02br 02br 02br 00Nimbostratus clouds are thick --> Noun + verb + adj 02br 00But how the sentence after comma ? 02br 02br 002. People who reserve the letters of words ..... to read suffer from dyslexia 02br 00a. when trying 02br 00b. if they tried 02br 00c. when tried 02br 00d. if he tries 02br 02br 00i tried to analysis, please correct it 02br 00- People suffer from dyslexia 02br 00- People who reserve the letters of words suffer from dyslexia 02br 00- People who reserve the letters of words when trying to read suffer from dyslexia 02br 02br 00Ohh i confuce, could anyone explain it to me ? 0-
Top answer
0 Hi unix77, 02br 02br 00in your second question, I think you mean "reverse" and not "reserve"? 0-
— Julielai
0 Hi unix77, 02br 02br 00in your second question, I think you mean "reverse" and not "reserve"?
0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 Hi, Unix, 02br 02br 00Let me try for the first part: 02br 00Nimbostratus clouds are thick clouds and are dark gray clouds ... 02br 00Nimbostratus clouds are thick (clouds and are) dark gray clouds ... 02br 01b00Nimbostratus clouds are thick, dark gray clouds...02b00 ... forebode rain. 02br 02br 00The
0 To unix77, 02br 02br 00Re: Nimbostratus clouds are thick, dark gray clouds .... forebode rain. 02br 02br 00Your above sentence is actually made of two sentences, 02br 02br 00i) Nimbostratus clouds are thick clouds WHICH forebode rain. 02br 00ii) Nimbostratus clouds are dark gray clouds WHICH forebode rain. 02br 0
0 To pieanne, 02br 02br 00Re: Nimbostratus clouds are thick clouds and are dark gray clouds ... 02br 02br 00FYI, your above sentence is in itself composed of TWO sentences, 02br 02br 00i) Nimbostratus clouds are thick clouds ... 02br 00ii) Nimbostratus clouds are dark gray clouds ... 02br 02br 00Combin
0 Temico, I can't quite see your point... Of course you can write a sentence that way if you want. 02br 00In my explanation above, I had only tried to split the sentence to explain the construction better - I may have failed 05000 -.02br 00I must say that I find the original sentence a bit clumsy... 010id6
0 pieanne, 02br 02br 00I don't find anything "clumsy" in the original sentence. Here's another similar example. 02br 02br 00"Mr. Brown is a grey-haired old man who likes to take naps on park benches." 02br 02br 00This sentence can be split up into two sentences:- 02br 02br 00i) Mr. Brown is a grey-haired man who like
0 Temico. Certainly, you can write 2 sentences if you wish, though most people would find this a little clumsy and unnecessary, as pieanne says. 02br 02br 00(I could write the above in 2 or even 3 sentences, but it would not make it better English, and certainly it would not be fluent.) 02br 01blockquote
0 Abbie, 02br 02br 00Re: sometimes the use of language does not necessarily follow a strictly logical format. 02br 02br 00You are dead right about that, otherwise how would you explain why you "DRIVE on the PARKWAY", but "PARK on the DRIVEWAY"!! 0-