You see both forms used. I prefer the version without "to". I believe you mean "species" not "spices"!
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
GPYI believe you mean "species" not "spices"!I didn't note it and just quoted!
GPYYou see both forms used. I prefer the version without "to".Why doesn't stop need to come with to? It's not the main verb.
KhoshtipManthe changed partNo. For a do-echo the 'to' is optional. The original is fine. Your change is also fine.shallshould be "... do is to stop hunting...". Agree?
KhoshtipManWhy doesn't stop need to come with to?I see the first "to" as governing "stop" as well as "do", so the second one is redundant (though not actually incorrect, according to usage).
KhoshtipManP.S: I deliberately used "shall".Because you wanted it to sound like a formal legal document? That's what it sounds like when you use 'shall' like that.
CalifJimBecause you wanted it to sound like a formal legal document? That's what it sounds like when you use 'shall' like that.Legal? Not exactly. In the blink of an eye, I thought of it as to be nearer to BrE rather than Am. (I'm trying to make myself ready for a British exam!
KhoshtipManI thought of it as to be nearer to BrE rather than Am. (I'm trying to make myself ready for a British exam! )"shall" sounds out of place there in BrE too. It sounds as if you are making a formal legal proclamation.