0
English 1b3 Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Clause analysis of 1 sentence

I'm like a comedian in the same way that Burger King is a restaurant.

What type of clause is this, please?

Thanks
  

Top answer

I'm a comedian in the same way that Burger King is a restaurant . Isn't it a noun complement (of 'way')? I dunno offhand.

  • I'm a comedian in the same way that Burger King is a restaurant .
  • Isn't it a noun complement (of 'way')?
  • I dunno offhand.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

12 Answers
0
I'm a comedian in the same way that Burger King is a restaurant.

Isn't it a noun complement (of 'way')? I dunno offhand.
0
Would have been my guess. We shall both agree and defend our case. Cheers.
0
The whole sentence is a simile: the quality of my acting as a comedian is compared to the quality of the Burger King's service being on a level with a restaurant. The clause "that Burger King is a restaurant" is a copula doing the job of the co-ordinating main clause in the sentence (the other main clause is "I'm like a comedian").
0
Hi,

It seems to me an adjectival clause describing 'way'.

Clive
0
English 1b3 in the same way that Burger King is a restaurant.
It's a relative clause. The antecedent is "way".

Burger King is a restaurant this way (whichever way that happens to be).

I'm like a comedian this way, too. So, I'm like a comedian the same way.

So,

I'm like a comedian (in) the same way that Burger K
0
I'm like a comedian in the same way that Burger King is a restaurant.

Burger King is like a restaurant in the same way that I'm a comedian
CalifJim
English 1b3 in the same way that Burger King is a restaurant.
It's a relative clause. The antecedent is "way".Burger King is a restaurant this way (whichever way that happen
0
English 1b3I'm like a comedian in the same way that Burger King is a restaurant.
What type of clause is this, please?

It's a declarative content clause, introduced by the subordinator 'that', functioning as complement of the noun 'way'. This is evident from the fact that the rest of the clause, i.e. 'Burger King is a restaurant' does not differ
0
Then does this sentence contain a relative clause?

I'm like a comedian in the same way in which Burger King is a restaurant.
_______________


How do we analyze these? Both content? One content -- one relative? Both relative?

Mark knew the reason (that) I showed up.
Mark knew the reason for which I showed up.
_____
0
BillJThis is evident from the fact that the rest of the clause, i.e. 'Burger King is a restaurant' does not differ from that of a main clause.
It seems to me that this happens whenever a place, time, manner, or reason is relativized, because those will be adjuncts in the subordinate clause. Isn't that true?


This is the place where I used to e

Related Questions