0im not sure if the negation in the following examples are clausal or subclausal.02br 02br 00can someone please help. and explain.02br 02br 001-i know nothing about it02br 02br 002-the culprit was certainly nobody we knew02br 02br 003-nobody could have argued the case more persuasively02br 02br 004-he rarely sees her these days.02br 02br 00also im not sure whether the 'not' in the following examples belong syntactically in the superordinate clause or the subordinate one.02br 02br 00it is not working properly. 02br 02br 00can someone explain me the diff between the two, then maybe i can do the questions.02br 02br 00thankyou02br 02br 00Beyazgul0-
Top answer
01. 02br 002. 02br 003.
— Paco2004
01.
02br 002.
02br 003.
Nobody could have argued the case more persuasively02br 00(clausal neg)02br 004.
02br 005.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
01. I know nothing about it.02br 00(sub-clausal neg) I know something about other things, though.02br 002. The culprit was certainly nobody we knew.02br 00(sub-clausal neg) The culprit may be a person people except us know.02br 003. Nobody could have argued the case more persuasively02br 00(clausal neg)02br 004. He rarely se