0
Musicgold Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Claimed to had…

Hi,



The following sentences are from the media. I understand that 'claim to had' has been used to indicate that the thing occured in the past.

Would the meaning of the sentences change if I replaced the underlined ‘had’ with ‘having?’



  1. 1. Ten women have claimed to had intimate relationships with the star.

  2. 2. The author claimed to had attended a legally mandated exhibitor's screening.


Thanks,



MG.
  

Top answer

Sorry, but "had" is incorrect. You should substitute "have" for "had" in both examples. Also, "claim" is a verb that, in the main, takes the infinitive form of a verb (that follows it).

  • Sorry, but "had" is incorrect.
  • You should substitute "have" for "had" in both examples.
  • Also, "claim" is a verb that, in the main, takes the infinitive form of a verb (that follows it).
  • So, using "having" is not possible.
  • You can say: They claimed to have seen the president.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Sorry, but "had" is incorrect. You should substitute "have" for "had" in both examples.

Also, "claim" is a verb that, in the main, takes the infinitive form of a verb (that follows it). So, using "having" is not possible.

You can say:

They claimed to have seen the president.

He claimed to be the president


For reference, take a look at definition
0
MrPernickety,

Thanks.

A follow up question with respect to the first sentence. With a 'have', how do you differentiate between a past relationship and a current relationship? For example, the following setence can apply even if the the relationships are current.

Ten women have claimed to have intimate relationships with the star.


0
Ten women have claimed to have intimate relationships with the star. - current relationships

Ten women claimed to have had intimate relationships with the star. -- past relationships

Related Questions