0
Soheil1 Posted 13 years ago
Grammar
(chess) versus
Hi.
"Typically, endgames are played with a Bishop versus knight, a Rook versus Rook, or a Rook and a minor piece versus a Rook and a minor piece ."
Can it read 'a Bishop versus a knight' and 'a Rook versus a Rook'? if so, what is the reason for this way of writing?
Thanks in advance
"Typically, endgames are played with a Bishop versus knight, a Rook versus Rook, or a Rook and a minor piece versus a Rook and a minor piece ."
Can it read 'a Bishop versus a knight' and 'a Rook versus a Rook'? if so, what is the reason for this way of writing?
Thanks in advance
Top answer
The writer is a bit careless, that's all. No real harm done. Your version is more proper.
- The writer is a bit careless, that's all.
- No real harm done.
- Your version is more proper.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
3 Answers
0
The writer is a bit careless, that's all. No real harm done. Your version is more proper.
00
0
By our graciously supplying the tacit articles with the tiny fraction of our brains that takes.
A similar way to his is, "Typically, endgames are played Bishop versus Knight, Rook versus Rook, or Rook and minor piece versus Rook and minor piece." He kind of mixed up the two styles. I call his way a mistake, but as I said, it ain't the crime of the century, and I think it's well within a w
A similar way to his is, "Typically, endgames are played Bishop versus Knight, Rook versus Rook, or Rook and minor piece versus Rook and minor piece." He kind of mixed up the two styles. I call his way a mistake, but as I said, it ain't the crime of the century, and I think it's well within a w
0
Related Questions