Chaucer on-line

[nq:1]Yes, it's taken 527 years but it was worth the wait.[/nq]
It certainly was! Thanks for posting that link, John.

Dena Jo
Chaucerian
(Email: Replace TPUBGTH with denajo2)

Thus spake John Dean:
[nq:1]Yes, it's taken 527 years but it was worth the wait. The British Library have finally got Caxton's original edition on-line[/nq]
Ha! You lie! "The originals are both in the British Library."
[nq:1]http://www.bl.uk/treasures/caxton/homepage.html[/nq]
Simon R. Hug

[nq:1]Yes, it's taken 527 years but it was worth the wait. The British Library have finally got Caxton's original edition on-line http://www.bl.uk/treasures/caxton/homepage.html[/nq]
How long before the Schultzes find a singular "they"?

Ross Howard

[nq:1]Thus spake John Dean:[/nq]
[nq:2]Yes, it's taken 527 years but it was worth the wait. The British Library have finally got Caxton's original edition on-line[/nq]
[nq:1]Ha! You lie! "The originals are both in the British Library."[/nq]
You've lost me.

John Dean
Oxford
De-frag to reply

[nq:2]Yes, it's taken 527 years but it was worth the wait. The British Library have finally got Caxton's original edition on-line http://www.bl.uk/treasures/caxton/homepage.html[/nq]
[nq:1]How long before the Schultzes find a singular "they"?[/nq]
Henry Churchyard already has Chaucer on his "singu

On 25 Oct 2003 13:57:55 GMT, Dena Jo
[nq:2]Yes, it's taken 527 years but it was worth the wait.[/nq]
[nq:1]It certainly was! Thanks for posting that link, John.[/nq]
Golly gosh, certainly so, and wowie, John! Me Too with the "thanks", John! And let's not forget to say *** bless AOL and chat groups, John! If I'd overlooked today's first entry after a Googlian search on "Chaucer", I'd ne

[nq:2]Yes, it's taken 527 years but it was worth the wait.[/nq]
[nq:1]It certainly was! Thanks for posting that link, John.[/nq]
Off topic: I hope all those AUEers who live in California are OK after the recent bushfires.

Rob Bannister

[nq:2]It certainly was! Thanks for posting that link, John.[/nq]
[nq:1]Off topic: I hope all those AUEers who live in California are OK after the recent bushfires.[/nq]
And the rest of us hope they, along with some of the other residents, burned up, dying a horrible death, or do each of us need to state we hope all are OK? What about other world disasters and well wishes? Will I be amiss i

On 25 Oct 2003 13:57:55 GMT, Dena Jo
[nq:2]Yes, it's taken 527 years but it was worth the wait.[/nq]
[nq:1]It certainly was! Thanks for posting that link, John.[/nq]
Rewording my comments of yesterday, if everyone thanked others for providing a fact, there'd be a whole lot of daily one-liners here most of us could do without. They fall squarely in the "Me too" category and the fewer "M

[nq:2]Off topic: I hope all those AUEers who live in California are OK after the recent bushfires.[/nq]
[nq:1]And the rest of us hope they, along with some of the other residents, burned up, dying a horrible death, ... all are OK? What about other world disasters and well wishes? Will I be amiss if I leave one out?[/nq]
I think you have a good underlying point, but it's spoilt by overstate