0
HSS Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

Change the Rules of the Game

Hi, I've just come up with sentences using the expression "change the rules of the game." Do they sound fine?

1) Firms with breakthrough technologies can change the rules of the game for their respective industries. Other companies soon follow suit.
2) The industry has never seen such handsome money flowing in. MaxPharm changed the rules of the game; inspired by the Euro-American company, who made a great amount of profit out of their innovative vaccines, many pharmaceutical companies are now competing to manufacture more vaccines, against a wide array of diseases, than ever before.

Hiro
  

Top answer

Hi HSS HSS 1) Firms with breakthrough technologies can change the rules of the game for their respective industries. Other companies soon follow suit. The first sentence is OK, but the second one is odd because it sounds as if you mean that "Other companies also change the rules of the game".

  • Hi HSS HSS 1) Firms with breakthrough technologies can change the rules of the game for their respective industries.
  • Other companies soon follow suit.
  • The first sentence is OK, but the second one is odd because it sounds as if you mean that "Other companies also change the rules of the game".
  • It seems to me that you must be trying to say that other companies soon follow the lead of the company/companies with breakthrough technologies.
  • in other words, other companies soon start following the new "rules" -- but to me that is not what your second sentence actually says in the context.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
Hi HSS
HSS1) Firms with breakthrough technologies can change the rules of the game for their respective industries. Other companies soon follow suit.
The first sentence is OK, but the second one is odd because it sounds as if you mean that "Other companies also change the rules of the game". It seems to me that you must
0
Yankee"Until recently, the pharmaceutical industry had seen relatively little competition and innovation in vaccines."
Hi, Amy. Would this be "had seen" or "has seen"? I trust the sentence would be better with "has" and, actually, that you could hold my first sentece with a little change from "has never seen" to "is now seeing" following your suggested se
0
Hi HSS

I wrote "had seen" instinctively. In other words, I wasn't paying any special attention to which verb tense I used when I wrote the sentence. However, when I look at it again today, that is still the tense I would choose. You used the simple past tense in "changed the rules of the game", thus "little competition and innovation" came before that change. The past perfect reflects t
0
YankeeI wrote "had seen" instinctively. In other words, I wasn't paying any special attention to which verb tense I used when I wrote the sentence. However, when I look at it again today, that is still the tense I would choose.
Hi, Amy.

Seeing 'until recently' made me think it should be 'has seen.' I've thought 'until recently' could only be used with
0
HSSI've thought 'until recently' could only be used with the past perfect or the simple past.
Ooops!!! I mean 'present past.' I was a space cadet.

Hiro

Related Questions