0
Abil Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

carrying a rucksack on his back

The man was carrying a rucksack on his back.

Is the above correct. Also, can I say:

"Take your rucksack on your back."? Thanks
  

Top answer

Yes. However, I'd say 'had' would be a more common word than 'carried'. And in N.

  • Yes.
  • However, I'd say 'had' would be a more common word than 'carried'.
  • And in N.
  • America, I seldom hear 'rucksack'.
  • The common term is 'backpack'.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
HI,
The man was carrying a rucksack on his back.Yes. However, I'd say 'had' would be a more common word than 'carried'. And in N. America, I seldom hear 'rucksack'. The common term is 'backpack'.
Is the above correct. Also, can I say:

"Take your rucksack on your back."? Sounds a bit odd. If you mean 'put it on your back', I'd say 'Put your backpack on'.

Clive
0
I know "rucksack" is an old use, although it is still commonly used in some places in the Indian sub-continent.

By the way, can I say "put your backpack on your shoulder."?
0
Hi,
Yes, but 'on your shoulder' is not the same as 'on your back'.

Best wishes, Clive
0
Thanks Clive.

Does "on your shoulders" mean slinging the backpack from the shoulders?
0
Hi,
Yes. But you said 'shoulder', which means one shoulder.
Best wishes, Clive
0
Thanks.

One more question. The plural "shoulders" does not change the meaning, does it?
Or does it mean that he is carrying two bags?
0
Hi,
The number of rucksacks depends on whether you say 'rucksack' or 'rucksacks'. It doesn't depend on whether you say 'shoulder' or 'shoulders'.
Clive
0
Got it. Thanks Clive.

Related Questions