Can/could be dangerous
Hi!
'could' is the past tense of 'can', why does the first express strong possibility but the second expresses weak possibility?
1- It can be dangerous to cycle in the city.
2- It could be dangerous to cycle in the city.
Top answer
Tara2 'could' is the past tense of 'can', why does the first express strong possibility but the second expresses weak possibility? Because 'could' is usually not the past tense of 'can'—for which we more commonly use 'was able to'. 'Could' is usually the conditional or concessive form of 'can'.
- Tara2 'could' is the past tense of 'can', why does the first express strong possibility but the second expresses weak possibility?
- Because 'could' is usually not the past tense of 'can'—for which we more commonly use 'was able to'.
- 'Could' is usually the conditional or concessive form of 'can'.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Tara2'could' is the past tense of 'can', why does the first express strong possibility but the second expresses weak possibility?
Because 'could' is usually not the past tense of 'can'—for which we more commonly use 'was able to'. 'Could' is usually the conditional or concessive form of 'can'.
0
Related Questions