0
PreciousJones Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Can/could

No lunch could last forever. Or

No lunch can last forever.

No meal could last forever. Or

No meal can last forever.

Whats the difference between using can and could in each sentences?
  

Top answer

can is like is . could is like would be . 1 It is not possible for a meal/lunch to last forever.

— CalifJim

  • can is like is .
  • could is like would be .
  • 1 It is not possible for a meal/lunch to last forever.
  • (can) 2 It would not be possible for a meal/lunch to last forever.
  • (could) 1 Neutral attitude.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
can is like is.

could is like would be.

1 It is not possible for a meal/lunch to last forever. (can)

2 It would not be possible for a meal/lunch to last forever. (could)

1 Neutral attitude. Presentation of what is believed to be a general principle or fact.

2 Context dependent. Possibly showing an attitude of disbelief o
0
0
Yes. Brother CalifJim is absolutely right.

Calif ! Could you please take a loook at my "are these passives" post .

It will be so nice of you. Sir!
0

Related Questions