Can you share your precious view?

0 05102br
02br
00I'm reposting the question again because the picture of the image doesn't show up in the previous posting.02br
02br
00Please feel free to share your precious opinions on the basis of opinions suggested before.02br
02br
02br
02br
00The following is from a Korean scholarastic aptitude test.02br
02br
02br
00Would you try this?02br
02br
02br
00The question is to choose the number of word which is not proper on the basis of the following picture.02br
02br
02br
001. 다음 그림을 바탕으로 한 글의 흐름으로 보아, 밑줄 친 단어의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은? [3점] 02br
02br
02br
02br
02br
05205002br
02br
02br
02br
00If you connect a primitive digital camera to your PC and aim it at a happy face, your computer might perceive the image as it appears on the right-hand side of the given drawing. The digitized image of the face is ①01u00rough02u00 because the computer thinks in terms of ones and zeros and makes all-or-nothing approximations. This will, in some cases, ②01u00enhance02u00 subtle information about light versus dark differences, hence the ③01u00lack02u00 of detail in the eyes and mouth, and in other cases ④01u00exaggerate02u00 such differences, as shown in the edges of what should be a ⑤01u00smooth02u00, gradually curving face. 02br
02br
02br
02br
02br
02br
00Thanks for reading.02br
02br
02br
00The answer is #2 01u00enhance02u00.02br
02br
02br
00What I want to know is if #2 is not proper, what word is possible?02br
02br
02br
00Thanks. 02br
02br
02br
00<Clive from Canada>02br
02br
02br
00Hi,02br
02br
02br
00I don't really find the word 'enhance' wrong in this context.02br
02br
02br
00Best wishes, Clive02br
02br
02br
00<Tidus from England> 02br
02br
02br
00I don't fully understand what this is actually saying, but "enhance subtle information about light versus dark differences, hence the lack of detail...", if subtle information is 'enhanced', it doesn't sound right that it would lead to a 'lack' of detail? I'd have thought, enhanced would result in more detail? 02br
02br
02br
00Therefore, you could replace 'enhance' with 'affect' or 'reduce'02br
02br
02br
00<Grammar Geek from Pennsylvania, USA>02br
02br
02br
00I think "ignore" might work. 02br
02br
02br
00It can't see the subtle difference - it's all black or it's all white, so if a spot it's looking at has both, it has to make a decision about whether to go all black or all white. Other choices: overlook, minimze...02br
02br
02br
00<Stenka25's reply for all of the opinions above>02br
02br
02br
00Thanks all of you.02br
02br
00Clive, Tidus, Grammer Geek.02br
02br
00I think Tidus' and Grammer Geek's reply is logical. 02br
02br
02br
00Here's what I thought on the ground of your opinions.02br
02br
02br
00In the following part, "enhance subtle information about light versus dark differences," ENHANCE contradicts LACK in "the lack of detail."02br
02br
02br
00Since "enhance subtle information about light versus dark differences" means that the image becomes more clear, "the lack of detail" conflicts with "enhance subtle information about light versus dark differences."02br
02br
02br
00In the given drawing 'the lack of detail' makes sense, so 'enhance' is wrong. And this is Tidus' point. 02br
02br
00But in terms of proper words, I think Grammer Geek's answer is better.02br
02br
00So I take his one, 'ignore or overlook.'02br
02br
00Am I right?02br
02br
00(Thanks for reading this long post, but I want to doublecheck^^)02br
02br
00Pleas feel to join to share your opinion.02br
02br
00Thanks.02br
030srcfile:///C:/DOCUME~1/BAEDON~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/Hnc/BinData/EMB00000e6403e7.jpgw146h133511name[문서의 처음]512name#571f0bb0