That is correct, but you're asking the reader to do arithmetic, and it is usual to express that idea as a ratio of games won to games lost, variously expressed as "win-to-loss ratio", "win-loss ratio", "win/loss ratio", "win-lose ratio", etc. So, "Your win-loss ratio is very low. 042)
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousCan you say the following :Are they natural?Your win/lose ratio is lower than 1:1.I need to get my win/lose ratio up. My ratio is too low.ThanksThey are OK.
AnonymousIs correspond the right word and are the 2 sentences natural? How would you say this :I am in the league that corresponds to my level. I'm not in a league that's too strong for me nor too weak for me.That's fine, except "nor" should be "or".
Anonymous I play this game clash of clans where your goal is to get as high level as p
AnonymousIs there an explanation as to why you have said 'on'?No, now that you mention it. I might just as well have used "at".
AnonymousWould you choose on? How would you say these 2?I want to be on a basketball team on my level.I want to be on a basketball team with people on my level. I don't want them to be too good nor too weak.