0
Anonymous Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

Can we used an adjectives after a noun without a verb to be?

For example:
-The map was intended to show areas prone to risk like floods, landslides, drought and quakes.

Here, I learned that the word 'prone' is an adjective so it looks kinda weird to me without a verb-to-be preceding the word 'prone'

I've tried searching for the rule behind it and found 2 possible answers:
1)It's a reduced relative clause
2)It's a middle age english style of writing

What actually is it ? Can you please explain it to me and give some examples? Thank you so much.
  

Top answer

I can't speak for the Middle English concept, but it is, indeed, a reduced relative clause ("that are" eliminated).

  • I can't speak for the Middle English concept, but it is, indeed, a reduced relative clause ("that are" eliminated).
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
I can't speak for the Middle English concept, but it is, indeed, a reduced relative clause ("that are" eliminated).
0
The map was intended to show areas prone to risk like floods, landslides, drought and quakes.

I see that as an adjective phrase. AdjPs occurring postpositively (after the head of the noun phrase) usually contain their own following dependents:

children keen on sport (but not *children keen)
a report full of errors (but

Related Questions