Yes.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
ozzourtiI wonder if those two sentences sound good to speakers of BrE.I've read somewhere that it's an Americanism. I don't know. It doesn't seem quite right to me, and it doesn't seem quite wrong either, and I'm American.
KJinCali79"He didn't complete his work yet" is the negative form of the simple past, "He completed his work." In the positive form it indicates that the activity happened in the past, and is over and done with now. In the negative form it implies that "he" was supposed to have completed his work at some time. With that in mind, "He didn't complete his work yet" sounds odd
canadian45People who think that only perfect tense can show relevance to the present of course use it in such situations. But that's just an arbitrary decision they (make)(accept), and it's not surprising that the simple past then seems wrong to them.Let me ask you then how you would describe the differences between simple past, past perfect, simple present a
CalifJimIt seems to me that the definition of "yet" that is most relevant to this discussion is "up to now".He didn't complete his work up to now.Put that way, it does seem wrong.CJExactly! The simple past doesn't work for indicating the present state, and yet is an indicator of the current situation.