Can somone Pleasse help me proofread this Goverment knowledge may help

pleaasse help i think its right but idk
DBQ VI
Judicial Branch: National and State
Jason should not be stripped of his religious beliefs in a Public school environment? He is a valedictorian, given the highest academic achievements of his class clearly with religious believes. The constitution should protect his freedom of speech under his civil right, as long as he is not pushing his beliefs on another student under the first amendment. The school may have jurisdiction over some things but they shouldn’t control every aspect.
The first amendment also clearly states that individuals are granted the freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly. The fourteenth amendment supports the first by due process of law and not denying individuals protection of law. So in this case if Jason was not pushing his opinion on other student he should be allowed to keep the references to Jesus Christ. Northwest ordinance also supports Jason’s speech by saying that no individual demeaning himself in a peaceful and orderly manner, and that no individual should be deprived of their rights of mode of worship or religious sentiments.
In context Jason’s valedictory address is an example of government speech endorsing religion which the establishment clause forbids. So on the contrary Jason should not be able to force his opinion on other students in the public environment, but in a private setting it would be allowed, Such as a parent at home telling their child to go to church. This means that the school would say that he is imposing his beliefs on other students which he is not, he is merely referencing them to the other students. So what is not allowed is what is occurring in document F, where the state of Alabama wished to “characterize prayer as a favored practice”. Which in this situation the student should be given the opportunity to prayer in school,but again the context says he is referencing his beliefs so this would not be a liable reason to force Jason to take out his references.
What is controversial is that document G says that students rights in a public school are not automatically equal to adult in other setting. In no sense does the constitution dictate that an individual is protected under certain amendment based upon age or being a student compared to an adult. Which document E says that school officials do not have complete authority over their students and that students have protection under the constitution in and out of school.
So in conclusion Jason’s should most definitely be able to state his speech for he is protected under the First and fourteenth amendment. Document E also says that school officials do not have complete authority over students and they have protection under the constitution in and out of school. So therefore if Jason is not pressing his personal religious believes onto other students saying that they need to believe in what he believes to obtain his educational status.