can someone help me with my essay please

0i am a forigner so i am not good at writing.02br
02br
00War on Terrorism02br
02br
00 00Since the 9/11 attack, the war on terrorism has been the focal point for 010200 government.00 00All over the world, people have opinions about war against terrorism.00 00But, no any other nation has concerned more about terrorism than 010200.00 00There are two opposite views by the two writers about terrorism.00 00Noam Chomsky, a leftist intellectual, is against the war and says that Bush administration is using an imperial grand strategy which means that 010200 has the right to accept the “preventive war” at will.00 00The opposite view by John O’Sullivan is to focus more on war against terrorism.00 00From the two arguments stated above, The Bush administration should not use “preventive war” strategy by the use of the force to reduce and expected or imaginary threat.02br
02br
00 00Both sides argue and presented their case in their articles to support their argument.00 00Noam Chomsky, in the article “One Man’s World”, argued that the government should not use their military power for without any good reason.00 00He says, “the use of military force to eliminate an imagined or invented threat, so that even the term preventive is too charitable” (Chomsky 398).00 00He also argues that the leader is free to change the rules at will.00 00For example, the president Bush failed to discover weapons of mass destruction, so to justify his action, he discover some of the equipment that could be used to produce weapons.00 00The other example Chomsky uses is when the president Bush declared that he had won a “victory in a war on terror” by removing an ally of al-Qaeda.00 00This was not important because there wasn’t any evidence that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were together.00 00Finally, he explained that the 0100U.S.0200 government used propaganda so Americans think Saddam Hussein as an immediate threat to the 010202br
02br
00 00On the other hand, John O’Sullivan, in the article “Where We Stand: The Situation in 010200, and How to Go Forward”, argued that the Bush administration should focus more on the war against terrorism.00 00He argues that war against terrorism should be the central point for the government.00 00He doesn’t like the way the government is fighting the war, so he gives three reasons on how to fight against terrorism.00 00John O’Sullivan states that “the war is being lost” (403).00 00He says in his article that the 010200 needs to increase the number of coalition casualties.00 00He thinks that deaths are in winnable cause and the sooner the Americans realize this, the quicker the terrorist will loose the battle. 00 00 00The other reason he states, “We need more troops on the ground-and that means troops from currently reluctant allies” (O’Sullivan 403).00 00Finally, he says that the U.N. needs to be involved in 010200 for the Coalition.00 00More troops in 010200 allies will weaken the terrorist from his understandings.00 02br
02br
00 00Well, both sides have very strong and completely different arguments.00 00There can be only one solution from the two arguments; one is that the government should stop using military force if there is no good reason for the war.00 00The other is to focus more on 010200 to fight war against terrorism.00 00I agree with the Chomsky argument that the government is using their military force to fight against terrorism even though they can prevent the war.00 02br
02br
00 00First, the Bush administration invaded 0100Iraq0200 for reasonable belief that 0100Iraq0200 had weapons of mass destruction that could be a threat to the 010200 00The government imagined that 0100Iraq0200 could be a threat if they have weapons of mass destruction, so they invaded 010200 with a poor reasoning.00 00According to Gregory Thielman, in the article “The Bush Administration top 40 lies about War and Terrorism,” “I believe the Bush administration did not provide an accurate picture to the American people of the military threat posed by 010200. This administration has had a faith-based intelligence attitude--we know the answers, give us the intelligence to support those answers.”00 00I believe this one of the main reason that 010200 is using their military force to invade a country without any reason.00 00Judith Miller states, in the article “Former Terrorism Official Faults Whit House on 9/11”, “'an unnecessary and costly war in 010200 that strengthened the fundamentalist, radical Islamic terrorist movement worldwide.”00 00Unnecessary invasion in 0100Iraq0200 made Islamic community stronger, because those people think the 010200 is trying to get their resources or rule them without any reason.00 02br
02br
00 00Second, the 0100U.S.0200 wants democracy in 0100Iraq0200 and the 00.00 00The Bush administration is interfering with the 00 countries and their values.00 00If 010200 is country of democracy, that doesn’t mean that other countries have to be like that.00 00Peter Baker, writes in the article “Democracy In Iraq Not a Priority In U.S. Budget”, “While President Bush vows to transform Iraq into a beacon of democracy in the Middle East, his administration has been scaling back funding for the main organizations trying to carry out his vision by building democratic institutions such as political parties and civil society groups.”00 00The 010200 government is wasting both the money and time by interfering with other nations.00 00It will cost a lot of money to promote democracy in 010200.00 02br
02br
00 00Third, the war on terrorism has cost billions of dollars for the 010200.00 00The congressional budget office says that wars in 0100Iraq0200, 010200, and other terror related expenses have reached more than $600 billions since 2001.00 00Lloyd Doggett, a democratic congressman, stats in the article “00US War on Terror Could Cost $2.4 Trillion by 2017”, “00The truth is that this administration from its original $50 billion estimate on the cost of the war in Iraq right through the estimates being made outside this committee today, consistently low-balls, misstates to the American people the true cost of the dollars, and of course, the true cost in blood that we are paying for this go-it-alone misadventure.”00 00Too much spending in Defense department has heart 010200 economy and their people.00 00If the Bush administration had prevented those wars, they could have used that money in other departments to boost our economy up.00 00The dollar is getting weak day by day, because 00 deficit is high compare to other developed nations.00 02br
02br
00 00Last, over a thousand 00 soldiers have died by the Bush administration’s war policy on terrorism.00 00As of today, 872 soldiers have died in Operation Iraqi Freedom and 129 Operation Enduring Freedom.00 00According to Kate Randall in the article “Relatives of U.S. soldiers killed in 0100Iraq0200 denounce Bush policy”, “Opposition to the war and occupation in 010200 is being voiced by the families of a number of US soldiers who have been killed there. Some relatives of the 15 soldiers who died as a result of last Sunday’s missile attack on a Chinook helicopter have openly denounced the Bush administration’s war policy.”00 00Bush administration is responsible for soldiers’ death, because they have an option to prevent this war.00 00It’s not like 0100Iraq0200 is invading 010200 and soldiers are needed.00 02br
02br
00 00The Bush administration needs to stop this war as soon as possible.00 00If they can stop the war on terrorism, the 010200 will save money and can use that money in other departments.00 00If the government decides to use that money and invest in 010200, Unemployment rate will go down.00 00The 00 soldiers’ death toll will significantly go down.00 00One good decision by stepping away from war can make big difference for this country.00 02br
02br
00 02br
01b02b02br
02br
00 00 00 02br
02br
02br
00 02br
02br
00 00 02br
02br
00 02br
02br
0-