0
Mirador Posted 6 years ago
Grammar

Can someone explain please?? (Clauses)

Look at the sentence:

—> That’s the actor who was a pilot in Star Wars.

The relative pronoun is the subject so we cannot omit it.

I know that we can omit the relative pronoun if it’s the object.


My question is :

Why can the relative pronoun be omitted from these following sentences ?

1)

—> My brother, who is a former professional hokey player, coaches elite high school hockey.

becomes:

—> My brother, a former professional hokey player, coaches elite high school hockey.

2)

—> Teachers who work online have flexible schedules.

becomes:

—> Teachers working online have flexible schedules.

3)

—> The man that was bitten by the dog went to hospital.

becomes:

—> The man bitten by the dog went to hospital.

  

Top answer

This is the same question you asked elsewhere except for part 3. The idea in your question 3 is the same as for the other sentence you asked about. There you had 'working online', a present participle clause, and here you have 'bitten by the dog', a past participle clause.

  • This is the same question you asked elsewhere except for part 3.
  • The idea in your question 3 is the same as for the other sentence you asked about.
  • There you had 'working online', a present participle clause, and here you have 'bitten by the dog', a past participle clause.
  • See Strictly speaking, the modifying participial construction is more than just leaving out the relative pronoun and a form of be because you don't even need a form of be to have a corresponding participle clause for a relative clause.
  • Scholars who studied culture and history in 2011 had ...
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0

This is the same question you asked elsewhere except for part 3.

The idea in your question 3 is the same as for the other sentence you asked about.

There you had 'working online', a present participle clause, and here you have 'bitten by the dog', a past participle clause.

See

Strictly speaking, the modifying participial construction is more than just leaving out the r

Related Questions