Can someone check my grammar please

I think it is unethical to try to win money because of death of a family member. There is no doubt at all that it would not be a good decision considering that I would be providing money to companies that cause the same disease to others.

In that sense, an ethical alternative is to invest that money in sectors which are not related in tobacco or any other vice such as alcohol, etc. Instead, I could invest in industries that provide an important technological advance or on improving the health and well-being of people. Also, considering that I have extra money, I could encourage me to invest in a start-up that has won a contest recognized of innovation to become a partner from its outset.

The consequences of these decisions can be two: It can provide income, whether substantial or few, or not providing any income. It is clear that the possibility of this position will depend 100 % on the type of financial advice I have had and that this is the right one, considering that the bag maintains a volatile behavior according to the events that happen in the world.

Personally, if I had money and it was not inherited in the circumstances presented in this case, I would not invest in a company of tobacco. This is, in part, by ethics and for a financial cause. First, over the years I have seen the snuff cause serious health consequences and appearance of the people. Second, nowadays there are many campaigns against tobacco, and we can see it clearly in the messages of the cigarette boxes, in some countries there is the ban that cigarette do not appear in commercials during daytime or family programs, a ban on no smoking in public places, etc. The constant medical reports on how harmful cigarette makes its global sales falling and therefore it would not be a safe investment