Anonymous Are both possible Yes. Anonymous but the use of can is more definitive? No, it is more encouraging.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousAre both possibleYes.
Anonymousbut the use of can is more definitive?No, it is more encouraging.
AnonymousEncouraging here means the possibility of happening is higher than 'could',No. If I had a child who was very worried that she might not do well, I would encourage her saying "You can do it." It has no implication of level of possibility.
AnonymousThanks. Can 'can' be used in your if clause example, or does the sentence have to be altered slightly, into the present form?Yes.
AnonymousAlso, when using could in the if clause, does
AnonymousSo the conditional form when using 'could' has to be in the past, just as in your example?Yes. It is a past form, but it is not past time. This form is called the present subjunctive. The subjunctive is used in second conditional sentences.
AlpheccaStarsSorry that I was unclear. The past form verbs in the if-clause are present subjunctive, not the modal (could/would) form in the main clause.You could pass (modal, present) the test if you studied (subjunctive present) hard.Sorry, but I don't agree. 'Study' (all persons) is present subjunctive; 'studied' is past subjunctive.