Can it also refer to past? Dennis was able to play the trumpet after four months. In this case which would be better to use 'could' or 'was able to'?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Nina_Nia Dennis will be able to play the trumpet after four months. (I didn't use 'can' as Dennis doesn't have the ability of p
fivejedjonYou're rather flogging a dead horse with so many very similar questions.Well, I have to disagree with you. I am posting these questions on behalf of a very curious student of English. She is a schoolgirl and wants to be 100% sure she knows the material very well. Flogging a dead horse is not the same as being enthusiastic about English.
fivejedjon'Can' is not wrong. However, as the ability to build it will come in the future, 'will be able to' is probably more likely.Maybe it's not wrong because it expresses possibility?
Nina_NiaDennis will be able to play the trumpet after four months. (I didn't use 'can' as Dennis doesn't have the ability of playing the trumpet yet.)Your reasoning is correct. You don't want 'can' there.
Nina_NiaMaybe the Smiths will be able to build a new house next year. Why is using 'can'
Nina_NiaDennis was able to play the trumpet after four months. In this case which would be better to use 'could' or 'was able to'?While I see no objection to either phrasing, I prefer 'was able to'. (I don't know why. Maybe it connotes the idea of ultimate success better than 'could'.)