On many older letter headings, you can see an address for both 'cables' and 'telegrams'. I had thought that one was another name for the other, but it appears that they are different animals. What is the difference ? I have checked various telegraph history web sites but not found enlightenment.
Top answer
[nq:1]On many older letter headings, you can see an address for both 'cables' and 'telegrams'. I had thought that one ... are different animals.
— Usenet
[nq:1]On many older letter headings, you can see an address for both 'cables' and 'telegrams'.
I had thought that one ...
are different animals.
What is the difference ?
[/nq] In British-influenced places a cable was overseas, while a telegram was inland.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]On many older letter headings, you can see an address for both 'cables' and 'telegrams'. I had thought that one ... are different animals. What is the difference ? I have checked various telegraph history web sites but not found enlightenment.[/nq] In British-influenced places a cable was overseas, while a telegram was inland. I believe, though others may know better, that this was becau
If this is not true, then it should be. All sounds about right.
The other entry which one sees next to these headings was, for examples, CODES: BENTLEYS which seems to indicate the type of commercial abbreviation codes which the company can read. The other mystery I have never been able to fathom is the use of ENDIT rather than ENDS to terminate telegrams. Ian Fleming uses it
snip [nq:1]The other mystery I have never been able to fathom is the use of ENDIT rather than ENDS to terminate ... ' at the end of the telegram indicates the end of the transmission, but why ENDIT instead of ENDS ?[/nq] I'd guess it was because "ends" could easily appear as a word in its own right in the body of a message, whereas "endit" was an unambiguous finishing word.
[nq:1]On 31 Jan 2005, hedjazrail wrote snip[/nq] [nq:2]The other mystery I have never been able to fathom ... of the transmission, but why ENDIT instead of ENDS ?[/nq] [nq:1]I'd guess it was because "ends" could easily appear as a word in its own right in the body of a message, whereas "endit" was an unambiguous finishing word.[/nq] At one time, when newspaper copy was typed
[nq:1]On many older letter headings, you can see an address for both 'cables' and 'telegrams'. I had thought that one ... are different animals. What is the difference ? I have checked various telegraph history web sites but not found enlightenment.[/nq] I don't disagree with any other answer. And I'm not sure of my own answer.
[nq:2]On many older letter headings, you can see an address ... checked various telegraph history web sites but not found enlightenment.[/nq] [nq:1]I don't disagree with any other answer. And I'm not sure of my own answer.
[nq:1]The British Racing Drivers' Club 12 Queen's Gate Terrace , London Telephones: Western 0092-3 Telegrams: Speedmen, Southkens, London Cables: Speedmen, London[/nq] And Percy Pilbeam's Argus Detective Agency had "Pilgus, Piccy, London". Mike.
[nq:2]On many older letter headings, you can see an address ... checked various telegraph history web sites but not found enlightenment.[/nq] [nq:1]I don't disagree with any other answer. And I'm not sure of my own answer.