0
Tung Quoc Posted 20 years ago
Grammar
by who?
Please read:
Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise concerns about companies held on their behalf with trustees and fund managers. (1)
= Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise concerns with trustees and fund managers about companies held on their behalf. (2)
1/ Is (1)= (2)?
2/ If yes, held is past participle. So, how can I write again (1) as follows:
Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise concerns with trustees and fund managers about companies that are held on their behalf by............... (by who?)
Thanks
Quoc
Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise concerns about companies held on their behalf with trustees and fund managers. (1)
= Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise concerns with trustees and fund managers about companies held on their behalf. (2)
1/ Is (1)= (2)?
2/ If yes, held is past participle. So, how can I write again (1) as follows:
Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise concerns with trustees and fund managers about companies that are held on their behalf by............... (by who?)
Thanks
Quoc
Top answer
I would say this: Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can discuss their worries with trustees and fund managers who hold their companies on their behalf.
- I would say this: Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can discuss their worries with trustees and fund managers who hold their companies on their behalf.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
5 Answers
0
I would say this:
Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can discuss their worries with trustees and fund managers who hold their companies on their behalf.
Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can discuss their worries with trustees and fund managers who hold their companies on their behalf.
00
Yes, but you don't understand what I want to ask.
Please read:
Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise concerns about companies held on their behalf with trustees and fund managers. (1)
= Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise con
Please read:
Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise concerns about companies held on their behalf with trustees and fund managers. (1)
= Pension fund members and endowment holders do not have the right to vote at annual meetings but they can raise con
00
Yes they all mean the same thing but some are more clearly expressed than others.
held on their behalf by the pension fund/investment company.
held on their behalf by the pension fund/investment company.
00
Nona The BritYes they all mean the same thing but some are more clearly expressed than others.hi nona,
held on their behalf by the pension fund/investment company.
Is 'raise concern with sb about sth", especially the 'with sb' part, a common collocation?
00
>(by who?)
by whom, especially in formal contexts such as this.
by whom, especially in formal contexts such as this.
0
Related Questions