Bussiness

Process Manager: Song Ki-dong manager, Business Management Team Leader, Interview Management Manager Bae Min-soo Assistant Manager;

Park Jeong-Yong, Head of Environmental Safety Team

Input: internal and external issues, previous year's business performance, management review input

Output: management review result, risk analysis result, business plan

Resources: ERP, MES

Out put: Analysis and action appropriate.

Risks/Opportunities: Analysis of key risk impacts and improvement management.

Establishment, review and approval of management policy, publication/publicity of management policy, schedule notification of business plan establishment guidelines (determined around the end of October), business plan establishment, reporting and approval, monthly KPI inspection and quarterly reporting.

A business plan is established based on the policy through internal and external business analysis. In accordance with the communication process, integrated management policies and guidelines are confirmed and distributed to each site including Vietnam. The policy established in 2021 is “Securing development quality, securing inspection quality assurance, establishing a year and site quality assurance system, and enhanced process management”. Securing business base”, etc.

Quality issues other than policy goals are being shared according to internal and external communication processes. Benchmarking and quality records are managed with the understanding of the organization.

An assessment /response plan is established and operationnalized through risk identification (monitoring and business impact analysis according to internal and external issues and stakeholder requirements), and the effectiveness of the response plan is assessed. As a business plan process risk, it is identified and monitored by establishing a cost management foundation. 2021.01.03 Confirmation of risk analysis result. Selected risks are re-evaluated on a semiannual basis. Items selected as risks are managed in connection with continuous improvement. In accordance with the theme selection of the monthly quality meeting, continuous monitoring of improvement items is being carried out.

The appropriateness, sufficiency, effectiveness and alignment of the management system are reviewed according to the cycle (once a year) planned by the CEO. Management review date: February 28, 2021 (reported at the quality management meeting). The input items met the requirements, and the previous management review output items such as "Improvement of the safety management process to prevent safety accidents, establishment of product discontinuation schedule, establishment of mold/tray/subsidiary material process" were taken. Management review was conducted according to the scheduled schedule, and "R&R facility to supplement the Worst LRR supplier quality improvement system and contribute to mass production quality assurance" are delivered and results are monitored through monthly quality management meetings . Quality goals are reflected in the business plan according to the policy and managed, and documented corrective actions are reported when performance is not achieved. Policies and goals are communicated Documented information is established/ revised/ managed/ discarded according to standards, and records are managed in consideration of the customer retention period Product safety (development), supplier performance, manufacturing process pass An escalation process for non-compliance is in operation.

Through risk analysis, labour shortages, infrastructure and major equipment failure, fire, utility failure, supply problemand quality problems were established, and the emergency plan tests were conducted according to the annual plan in January 2021. Testing was conducted, but no MDT review involving top management was performed.

The process of reviewing the contingency plan is not effective.

According to the annual plan, a test was conducted on the emergency plan established between January 21 and January 30, 2021, but the MDT review was not conducted.

However, a review of the MDT was not conducted, but all required emergency plans were established and inspections conducted as planned, so it was classified as minor nonconformance.